Google results:

Scams -- Dishonesty -- Abuse -- Religion -- White Supremacy -- Evolve Beyond Belief -- Opinion -- Humour

Back

 Privacy Statement
 Any inaccuracies will be corrected, if brought to publisher's attention.  Emails received will be posted on the "InternetS", in toto.
Thank you for writing. 
 

We do not sell your
email address
 to anyone. Make best offer.

  Audio Files  ♫  Far Cry 
  LINKS  
Hakenkreuz
Arno's step son,  has a huge SWASTIKA tattooed on his torso.

 More Audio

Arno Illig threatens more... worm.gif (3649 bytes)


The word "JIHAD" really means "STRUGGLE"                         Mein Jihad

 "I promise !!!!!!!!!!!!!"
  Really, really, this time  
for sure -- no doubt.  No Lie!
  Trust me me.  No Joke... 
 

Mein Jihad: This web page exists because Arno ILLIG threatened to beat me up.

If you don't do what I say,  I promise again, I WILL use more exclamation points ! And CAPS!
 Ask anyone -- my promise is as good as gold !      You know me...
 

"Just this one more time... I'll be back in my life if you can get mom and dad to pay for it."

♫ Video Trailer:

Play the
"GONZALES Cantata"

"I don't recall"
Audio files
Download to iPod		   LINK:   
NORBERT BUCHSBAUM
 1) PLEASE loan me more money <-  "Need money, propose business deal..."
 2) Arno offers a "porno flick" <-  "A porno tape would be good..."
 3 And, oh, make_that_$1,100 <-  "I can live on twenty bucks until the 30th"
 4) Business w/ relatives <-  "I've learned a lot about doing business w/ relatives"
 5) Waiting for Western Union $ <-  "I don't know when to expect the Western Union... porno flick"
 6) Jerking off...
 7) Making amends 13) Thanks for your concern
  9) I love you to death 14) Am I a 'Pathological Liar' ?
10) You plead for me... 15) Give me $2,500 just 1 more time
11) Crying 16) Mom, Dad to pay more...
12) I have a new SECRET employer 17) I'll repay you SOMEHOW...

 Here's how this all started...

Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 13:32:57 -0700
Subject: RE: ur so-called uncle/Your only warning!!! Pay attention!!!!!!!

Great language, spelling, grammar. THIS IS MY ONLY WARNING TO YOU HARALD!!!!!! If you do NOT expunge the lies you posted about me on Google  (*) IMMEDIATELY, I will sue you for libel, and you will not enjoy it. If need be, I will personally see you will get exactly what you deserve. Arno  * -- emphasis mine - ed.

CC:  pmoore@cowanmoore.com
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:27:51 -0700
Subject: RE: ur so-called uncle/Your only warning!!! Pay attention!!!!!!!/ E-mail to my Attorney, Mr. Perer Moore

I've sent this to my attorney, Peter Moore, If you do not expunge this garbage about me from Google ASAP, will direct him to sue you for slander/libel, and defamation of character. This is your last chance to make things right!!! If you really want to be sued, do the right thing. Otherwise you will pay $$$$$ dearly. Arno

CC:  pmoore@cowanmoore.com...
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:57:33 -0700
 Subject: Spam: Lawsuit against Harald /Cc to my Attorney, Mr. Perer Moore,  Attorney at Law.

Harald,

You'd think that yes, by now.
 it's Important, for christ's sake!

 I see, that you have not yet removed/expunged your slanderous posting about me on Google  . I have advised my Attorney, Peter Moore to sue you for libel/slander and defamation of character with actual action of malice. If it still appears on Google  and not removed, by no later than August 31st, 2009, I have instructed Mr. Moore to commence with legal action against you. It WILL hurt you in your pocketbook, I will $ue you for the max $$$$$$$$. I don’t care about my legal cost$, because you will more than pay for them with my award that I will win from you. Last chance to make things right before it will co$t you megabuck$.

Arno. Cc to my Attorney, [...], $ Lena.

  "If It's Important To YOU, It's Important To Me"

Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:20:47 -0600
To: "Arno " Arno
From:  <nowscape@nowscape.com>
Subject: PING...

X-Apparently-To: nowscape@nowscape.com via 209.191.90.81; Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:21:52 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [68.141.200.254]
Authentication-Results: mta117.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com  from=yahoo.com; domainkeys=pass (ok); from=yahoo.com; dkim=neutral (no  sig)

Date: 7 Aug 2009 19:21:52 -0000
From: MAILER-DAEMON@yahoo.com
To: nowscape@nowscape.com
Subject: failure notice

Rejected

<-- Look    Arno is blocking his email from me... but later he un-blocks it, at the same time denying that he had ever blocked it... I know, it's convoluted. Why make a lie about something that's so easy to demonstrate as such?  I don't know... call me stupid.

Arno decided to block his email again on   AUG 1  2009  
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
 
Arno:
64.185.112.82 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Message rejected as spam by Content Filtering.
 
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: <nowscape@nowscape.com>
Received: (qmail 70261 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2009 19:21:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO VALUED-3253602F.nowscape.com) (admin@71.195.206.171 with login)
  by smtp106.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Aug 2009 19:21:46 -0000

X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:20:47 -0600
To: "Arno " Arno
From:  <nowscape@nowscape.com>
Subject: PING...
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

From: Arno
To: 'MAY' nowscape@yahoo.com
Cc: To: ***@gmai.com
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:32:46 -0700
Subject: Spam: Harald is unblocked
 Thread-Topic: Harald is unblocked

I have never blocked Harald’s e-mails. I have just not dignified his insults with a response. Best wishes.

 

  "If It's Important To YOU, It's Important To Me"

From: Arno
To: '' nowscape@yahoo.com
Cc:, "'pmoore@cowanmoore.com'"
        <pmoore@cowanmoore.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:53:23 -0700
 

Who, moi?   It seems this guy can't open his mouth without lying. 

Subject: Spam: RE: Spam: Harald is unblocked

Don’t forget Harald, my lawsuit against you will commence September 1, 2009 for slander/libel if you don’t expunge your hateblog against me on Google. My attorney is looking forward to his 33.33%. Have another drink, enjoy it while you still can afford to go to the liquor store. Arno. C/c to Peter Moore, Attorney At Law.

 
From: nowscape@yahoo.com
Subject: Do the right thing Subject: failure notice
To: Arno
Cc: PostA@nowscape.com, pmoore@cowanmoore.com

Please be more specific, Arno.  
I can't expunge things from Google because I don't use Google! No one except Google can expunge things from Google. Your 'thief'-page is NOT hosted by Google for christ's sake.  Let me know what's wrong or false  or and I'll gladly fix it for you!  One thing I loathe to do is to get any fact wrong.

And again, as before, your emails or letters are NOT private; I can show them to anyone I please.
 
You lied about your email-blocking... same ol' arno... all in the spirit of reconciliation?  Do your worst.
On the other hand, you know what you need to do.  Do the right thing... soon later, whenever you find the time...
And again, please be specific.  

 
Kindest regards,
H.
ps... Your attorney works quite cheaply!  As you may know, in the lawsuit which we won against the Hospital which you refused to join but in which you benefited anyway, we had to pay much more, plus expenses, too.  I don't know if you ever thanked your sister for that.  I know you didn't thank me. 
InternetS publisher's statement: Any inaccuracies will be corrected, if brought to publisher's attention.  Emails received will be posted on the "InternetS", in toto.
Do these things suck? ~~ Unpleasant experiences with people, companies, professionals and organizations. Scams.

From: nowscape@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 9:46 PM
To: Arno
Subject: Arno and Kodachrome

 


Dear Arno,
 thank you for your email last night and for this opportunity to respond, now that you have finally unblocked (you deny this – why?), my emails to you emanating from this, my IP address.
 
After your graduation from high school, you evaded the military's draft to avoid being sent to fight in Vietnam and so you spent time in Austria to attend a school to learn how to become a hotelier / restaurateur.  Your father paid for almost everything.
 
In Europe you fathered your son Julian. Julian's mother, from Italy, doggedly tracked you down after you had settled in your town in WA and eventually contacted you and our parents. Your semi-successful evasions seem moot now; Julian's mom found our parents. Our mother then flew to Austria to meet Julian -- from whose existence and responsibility you seemed to have done your utmost to hide -- to establish a family connection in with your seed.
 
 
You had visited me once at the Fliegerhorst Kaserne, where I was stationed in Germany, at the US army base, near my dwelling in Langendiebach, where I lived with my wife when I was overseas in the army.
 
Next, you went to Canada to continue evading the draft. There, our father, the MD., financed a large house near the Pacific ocean's edge for you, complete with three or so apartment units. You did a lot of work to bring that place up to par. Our father also financed the acquisition of a nearby fine restaurant, "Peter's on Broadway”, in Vancouver BC, which you eventually had to abandon due to debt; you became a taxi driver.
 
Concurrently you had borrowed tens of thousands from your fellow restaurateur, Norbert Buchsbaum of Vancouver, BC, (the fellow whose wife was tragically murdered in a parking lot), and you never repaid a cent of that; correct me if I'm wrong.
 
In the early 1970's you repeatedly asked me for money, loans, etc., citing imminent dire circumstances. Some in our family thought you needed the money to buy cocaine.
 
When I loaned you money you have never attempted repayment.
 
"Borrow” seems top be the operative way with you.
 
In the 1980's you visited Julian's mother in Italy who gave you a cool reception. During that time period you also dropped in, on a circuitous vacation trip, on one of your previous farm employers in SD whose reception turned out to be only lukewarm.
 
Julian, your estranged son, a bright young Austrian-Italian young man, entered university and studied to become a medical doctor like his grandfather and your sister. Your father financed Julian's education at university and you paid nothing, to my knowledge, during this time. I believe (not know) this because you would have bragged about or mentioned it if you had.
 
Julian visited you in WA, and you still paid noting or little towards Julian's education as far as anyone in the family knows; our father continued, for years, to make monthly payments to your by now quite estranged son in order for him to attend medical school.
 
Our sister Petra financed your entry into the ultra light airplane business, which failed.
 
Thereafter, Petra had some unsatisfactory business dealings with you as I remember; then, at least one ultra light airplane went missing from our sister's hangar – this is how I remember it, family lore, but I can't be certain of any facts, only of what I was told.
 

Amazon.com


If you smoke...
Electronic Cigarette
by Smoking Everywhere
 ...then this is
probably better for you

After your divorce from Laurel our parents "experienced” a burglary at their house during that period for which they blamed you unequivocally. Some months thereafter, on the telephone, you admitted to me that you knew the whereabouts of some of the stolen items -- our mother's jewelry; and you later admitted to me on the phone that you had discovered our mother's missing jewelry in a pawn shop near your town in WA – and that you had contacted no one, no authority, about this.
 Hakenkreuz
Your wife's young son, stayed at my house overnight, whilst in transit, during those days. He was a neo-Nazi skinhead with a humongous black swastika recently tattooed on his torso, which he proudly displayed to us. He had driven from your town in WA to Colorado in order to avoid child support at home. Holly and I remember this as Jamie's stated reason for his sudden relocation.
 
I had remained your friend, your ally; I think you can concede that while no other member in our family would have anything to do with you that I remained your friend and faithful brother [sic!]. I had visited you and Sherry in WA and you both visited me here in my city, during that time. You said of her in her, here in her presence that she's "dumber than a mud fence”, remember? (We still have the X-mas video).
 
On one occasion you dropped in unexpectedly at my house in in order to gain access to your estranged parents who, as you well knew, had flown here to visit me at the same time on the occasion of my 50th birthday in 1994. Unfortunately they wanted to avoid meeting you after discovering that you had driven here to my home concurrently. But I took you in.
 
In 2001 you received from me some memorabilia which I had only borrowed myself from our father and Petie.
 
You tricked me into hand-delivering those 50-year old historic Kodachromes from Ethiopia, which are now the controversy here, to loan them you in WA. You pretended as if you intended to make. copies made of them, and that you'd return the originals afterwards.

After repeatedly having been asked many times by me for their return, you repeatedly refused to give them back, emailing me that you don't have the money just now to make copies for yourself: "I have been extremely ill for a long time and we just have not been able to deal with this”. You said "please have some more patience on this matter...", etc.


Your tactic changed from "you hate me because I earn a lot more money than you do” and (or?) "we are so broke right now we could not even pay (to have the slides copied)", and saying that possession is nine tenths of the law, etc., to stonewalling that you will not give them back until you're treated better (by the family?). Correct me if I'm wrong; I still have your emails from that time.
 
That act of yours broke my  camel's back, brother.
 
Yes, we had had some "political” conversations via email during this time, such as when you identified Rush Limbaugh as your hero ("listening to Limbaugh is like church to me”, you once told me) and berated or belittled Gore as a villain and as when you denied the reality of global warming and so on. I think our political differences are what made you angry with me and decide not to keep your word to return these slides. I could be wrong. Please correct any of the above, which is wrong.
 
Maybe you never had an a priori intention to return those Kodachromes. Now I think you suckered me into "borrowing” them by my hand delivery of them to you in WA. I'm not sure.
 
Then a blog with your emails caught your attention. You now complain about it again after all these years. Yes, you did make your views plain to me; but why to me? Now you ask me to expunge that blog from Google even though Google does not host it! Only Google can delete things from Google.
 
Now, mid-2009, you threaten a lawsuit; before you threatened to do me physical harm as is documented on the blog. The blog has the effect of protecting me in case your threats become reality, no? You have horribly slandered me, evidenced on the blogs. I find it disadvantageous to tell you more about any blogs out there because you are trying to hurt me.
 
Last week you called Petra to talk about what could be done to achieve reconciliation between us siblings (as far as I know she still may believe or think that you actually stole her airplane...); nevertheless she now offered some quite constructive suggestions, which I thought, were very good and proper and agreeable, for a reconciliation.
 
It's my understanding that you now offered to have those controverted slides copied and that you would give them to her (NB: not the originals, mind you, and not to me, as you had agreed and promised in 2001).


Be that as it may, at the same time that you phoned Petie in Alaska about reconciling, you fired off a fulminating email to me saying that you would sue in Utah court, you duplicitous snake. What am I to make of that?
 
It seems that throughout your life you have had a streak of dishonesty. In the early 60's you and your childhood friends were apprehended stealing a little red Radio Flyer wagon's load heaped to the brim with candy form a vending machine in the state capitol building in Pierre, SD. Our father feared that you might become a juvenile delinquent. Now eventually you have become a successful salesman.
 
It is informative to know what is at the root of this. What set you off  to feud with me in the first place? How have I wronged you before and how can we fix things? I hope and pray that you will tell me how to do the right thing. Your web page has changed.
 
Thank you kindly in advance for your reply.

 


 

InternetS publisher's statement: Any inaccuracies will be corrected, if brought to publisher's attention.  Emails received will be posted on the "InternetS", in toto.
Do these things suck? ~~ Unpleasant experiences with people, companies, professionals and organizations. Scams.


BUY THIS -- Pick one up for a friend!

Evolve Beyond Belief

The fun " EMOTICONS"  were  added --

From: Arno
To: '' nowscape@yahoo.com
Cc: [sister]
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:36:10 -0700
Subject: RE: Arno and Kodachrome

Hi [sister],

Please don’t bother getting yourself involved in this as “mediator” []. As you know, I never asked you to do this for us, as Harald just claimed (below). It is not your problem and I don’t want you to waste your precious time on his hateful lunacy against me. If you still wish to waste your time, of course, it is entirely up to you. But as you can see from Harald’s still continuing hatemonger ravings below, what you could do, is to offer psychological treatment to him. I would welcome setting things right between you and us.  To [] us it is obvious that 60ish year old adult siblings should be rational and let brotherly/sisterly love [ ...sic].  prevail. We cannot see that Harald is ready to not  [sic] let hate continue to govern his life. He enjoys hate, that’s just the way he is and probably always will be. He enjoys leading his life this way.

Sara Palin steered me to "DEPARTMENT OF LAW" in the White House for legal advice.  According to the DEPARTMENT OF LAW there, it's actually legal to show others any email one receives.  Correct me if I'm wrong!

Lastly, we will commence our lawsuit against Harald for malicious slander/libel if he does not instruct Google to remove his hateblog by no later than August 31, 2009. If it is still there on Sept. 1, 2009, my suit against him WILL commence.

Again, thanks for your generous attempt, but I recommend you not waste your time on this seemingly futile effort.

... Ed:  I added these... they used to be called  "Emoticons" during the Internets'es' early days -- OK, I'm behind the times!  I know!.

Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:48:09 -0600
To: Arno
From:  nowscape@yahoo.com
Subject: expunging things from GOOGLE

hi Arno,
OK.
OK.  I can doo that too:  Arno gets a deadline.

Peace.  First things first: You need to show good will and help me with some research. If you will give me the contact information about whom to talk to about removing things from Google I WILL do that then -- procedure, cost if any...  That is, if you will get on the stick and do it on or before August 27 2009.  After that all bets are off.  I'm tired of this too.

Meanwhile and to show good will I'll remove the "hateblog against you"  form the archives on the WayBack Machine machine (http://web.archive.org/web/*/http:/nowscape.com/). OK?

Are you still considering at least copying the slides now, as you promised ?
Besides this, what set you off to be so angry with me in the first place -- I asked you before!

Please respond quickly this time and PLEASE -- its necessary to send duplicate emails to me at the same email address of everything.

Kind regards, if applicable.

Publisher's statement:  Any inaccuracies will be corrected, if brought to publisher's attention.   Emails received will be posted, in toto.
Do these things suck? ~~ Unpleasant experiences with companies, professionals and organizations. Scams.

From: Arno
To: '' nowscape@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:02:15 -0700
Subject: RE: expunging things from Google
Thread-Topic: expunging things from Google

I have no idea as to how to expunge things from Google. You always bragged and claimed to be the computer expert and I?m sure with your great knowledge, you can do this. You put it on, you take it off. Even if I wanted to, I have no idea out what and how to do it. Please don?t forget the August 31st deadlind. Arno

 
 
To: Arno
From:  nowscape@yahoo.com
Subject: You must remember this...
 
I  have to make this quick because Olbermann, then Maddow are coning on soon.

Don't be, as you replied, sure.  Think, don't believe. I, too, have no idea "out what and how to do it". I done tole you. I said I'd do it if you would call and find out.  You know that unlike yours, my word is good.

For Now I have removed a copy of what you call a hate blog against you form the WayBack InternetS backup machine for you, like I told you earlier today. 

You didn't answer this:
Are you still considering at least copying the slides now, as you told promised?
What set you off to be so angry with me in the first place -- I asked you before!

Your Google exists because you threatened to do me harm.  That's my protection in case anything happens.  Now you threaten to harm me again, while saying you want reconciliation, snake.

For the last time, do the right thing; quit whining, be a man; your deadline is still in place, too; for the good of all try not to waste the time you have remaining... gotta go now.

Kind regards, as applicable.

InternetS publisher's statement:  Any inaccuracies will be corrected, if brought to publisher's attention.   Emails received will be posted here, in toto.
Do these things suck? ~~ Unpleasant experiences with people, companies, professionals and organizations. Scams.
 

From: Arno
 To: P.I.
CC: nowscape@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:03:01 -0700
Subject:  Another one of Haral's psycopathic Google postings/Riggs High School, Pierre SD.  Class of 1963 ~~ Does this suck

 Feb 2006

 

 

 


 

One of my other schools:

 Marquartstein

 

Page updated
2009-10-17

worm.gif (3649 bytes)Riggs High School Pierre, SD

A blog: Dishonesty -- Abuse -- Stupidity -- Recalcitrance, etc.

My high school made me stupid.

 

Returning It

Would you have pride in such a school?   [... snip... Arno emailed this↑ to me.  It's from here]

 


Please click on these images to purchase.     
From: Arno
To: '' nowscape@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:26:29 -0700
Subject: RE: You must remember this...

Thread-Topic: You must remember this...

I NEVER THREATENED TO DO YOU HARM, I SIMLPY SAID I WILL MAKE SURE YOU WILL GET WHAT YOU DESERVE. Remember August 31st is your deadline to remove your malicious slander/libel. It has already caused me harm from people asking me about it. Financial harm to me for customers/clients inquiring about my business ethics. My attorney is already licking his lips for one third of the BIG $$$ judgment against you we WILL win. Malicious, intentional defamation of character in a public forum was your BIG mistake which already cost me my reputation and $$$. Sept 1st, 2009 will be a great day for me. Enjoy the next  11 days. I already have pulled the value tax assessed value of your house to which we will attach a lien if you don?t have enough money or unwilling to pay to pay the full amount of the judgment . As your buddy Hussein Obama?s Reverend Jerimiah Wright said: ?The chickens will come home to roost?.

Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 03:07:36 -0600
To:  <Arno>
From:  nowscape@yahoo.com
Subject: arno's Treat-Denial: "...I promise to BEAT THE SHIT OUT OF YOU BIG TIME." -- An Inconvenient Truth.

I asked before: Are you now considering at least copying the slides now, as you promised our sister?   What set you off to be so angry with me in the first place? 

You lie about everything, you snake.  Dishonesty is your first and last refuge.  Apparently some interloper emailed me this crap, eh? It wasn't even you?  Maybe the InternetS need adjusted!  The more you lie , twist in the wind, thrash about, and try your famous crocodile tears (crocodile tears - as our mother often said of your crying - LINK:  Arno Crying ) , the less believable you seem.

Look:  "You will pay dearly..." ---  "Do I have to come over there and beat the shit out of you again like Barry Temprely and Steve Shultz did..." ---  "...he is a 63 year old loser and could be dangerous, especially toward young women..."  ---  "...you leave me no choice but to come to your house and BEAT THE SHIT OUT OF YOU AGAIN"  ---  "...I promise to BEAT THE SHIT OUT OF YOU BIG TIME." --- "I would bet you wouldn't have the guts to spew your hateful lies if you lived close by"  Try 'remembering" better, Arno, use your your fucking brain, for christ's Sake! "

Again, In anyone's book, the above actually does not  count as "I NEVER THREATENED TO DO YOU HARM" ?  Are you new here? What is your home planet?  And to my beautiful ex-wife you wrote: "Linda, Looks like my Bro still cannot fight his own battles and still needs to hide under a woman's skirt. (and get a look at her snatch, the pervert, as YOU well know)" (sic! Emphasis mine. :)

... And, the winner is...
This is a promise, you will pay for these untrue [sic!] lies about me, no matter how long it takes, you will pay...( I tried to keep your original fonts here, arno; I'm not making this up! :)  Your font as shown in my email client does not display as hugely as the font in which you originally sent me this -- your vile, fulminating but admittedly scary treats and pornographic imagery.  On my screen your font came out as about 13/16-in tall!  :)   As for your business ethics, I can only imagine what that could mean mean.  I do know of your business ethics with your estranged family and with me, with regard to this slide-borrowing, money-borrowing, business. Are you now considering at least copying the slides now, as you promised our sister?

Your development seems to have arrested at a little red Radio Flyer Wagon.   Grow up.  Get a life.

Please Help Eradicate Intolerance!    Consider doing the right thing!


I've played enough time now pasting this all in here, prettily and in your original blue colour.
Today's last reruns of Olbermann and Maddow are about to start and I want to see the parts that I missed earlier because of your Inconvenient Truth.

 

InternetS publisher's statement: Any inaccuracies will be corrected, if brought to publisher's attention.  Emails received will be posted on the "InternetS", in toto.
Do these things suck? ~~ Unpleasant experiences with people, companies, professionals and organizations. Scams.


 

  Back 
  The 101+  Book Atheism Library 		 And...
    Math / Logic Library

  And...
    A Science Library


Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 04:57:07 -0600
To: Dishonesty <Arno>
From:   nowscape@yahoo.com

Subject: If It's Important To YOU

It's important to me to get this resolved one way or another.  Yes, It's important to me to expunge your things from Google. I gave you a week with helping me find out how to do it and we still have a few days left.  Have you contacted Google or achieved ANYTHING at all on this?  Do you intend to do nothing?  If so, then that's easy for me to do to :(
Is your slogan  "If It's Important To YOU, It's Important To Me" a just another 'business ethic' slogan or do you mean it? 

You [promised] that you'd make copies of the slides.  How's that coming -- are you really going to do it as promised?
What set you off against me, anyway?  How important is this to you, or are you just toying with me?

 
Best regards.

Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 8:41:03 -0700
From: Arno  <Arno>
To:   nowscape@yahoo.com

   Tennants at the Home for the Unpleasant - Near Portland, OR.


Subject: Re: If It's Important To YOU
Cc:
Sensitivity: Normal

You have bragged for decades what a brilliant computer expert you are. Surely you know how to expunge your hate-blog against me from Google yourself? I'm justs a simpleton idiot when it comes to the internet/computers, as you have told me repeatedly. You put it on, you take it off PERIOD. Constantly insulting me will not win me over you your dilema. I've already got the printout of the tax assessed value ot you house and after I win my jugment against yopu you will either become my tennant or have to find another place to live. I prefer the latter. Don't forget August 31st, 2009, midnight. D-Day.
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:08:51 -0600
To: ARNO <Arno>
From: nowscape@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: If It's Important To YOU

Are you now considering at least copying the slides now, as you promised our sister? What set you off to be so angry with me in the first place?

And you still owe me money.

 Ger your Goat
Republicans, Religion and the Triumph of Unreason


 

Religulous --  Bill Maher gets kicked off LDS temple square

How do they train themselves to be so impervious to reality?

Something strange has happened in America in the nine months since Barack Obama was elected. It has best been summarised by the comedian Bill Maher: "The Democrats have moved to the right, and the Republicans have moved to a mental hospital."

The election of Obama - a black man with an anti-conservative message - as a successor to George G. W. Bush has scrambled the core American right's view of their country. In their gut, they saw the US as a white-skinned, right-wing nation forever shaped like Sarah Palin.

When this image was repudiated by a majority of Americans in a massive landslide, it simply didn't compute. How could this have happened? How could the cry of "Drill, baby, drill" have been beaten by a supposedly big government black guy? So a streak that has always been there in the American right's world-view - to deny reality, and argue against a demonic phantasm of their own creation - has swollen. Now it is all they can see.

Since Obama's rise, the US right has been skipping frantically from one fantasy to another, like a person in the throes of a mental breakdown. It started when they claimed he was a secret Muslim, and - at the same time - that he was a member of a black nationalist church that hated white people. Then, once these arguments were rejected and Obama won, they began to argue that he was born in Kenya and secretly smuggled into the United States as a baby, and the Hawaiian authorities conspired to fake his US birth certificate. So he is ineligible to rule and the office of President should pass to... the Republican runner-up, John McCain.

These aren't fringe phenomena: a Research 200 poll found that a majority of Republicans and Southerners say Obama wasn't born in the US, or aren't sure. A steady steam of Republican congressmen have been jabbering that Obama has "questions to answer". No amount of hard evidence - here's his birth certificate, here's a picture of his mother heavily pregnant in Hawaii, here's the announcement of his birth in the local Hawaiian paper - can pierce this conviction.


 George Carlin
 Back in Town


Carlin
on CampuS


Carlin - Doin'
It Again


But In The Morning, No!
COLE PORTER by Julie Wilson

 


 Encyclopedia
of
 Gods:
 Over 2,500 Deities
  of the World 
Best of
 Robert Ingersoll
More about George Carlin

Mp3. download; 99 cents cheap
Free Preview

This trend has reached its apotheosis this summer with the Republican Party now claiming en masse that Obama wants to set up "death panels" to euthanise the old and disabled. Yes: Sarah Palin really has claimed - with a straight face - that Barack Obama wants to kill her baby.

You have to admire the audacity of the right. Here's what's actually happening. The US is the only major industrialised country that does not provide regular healthcare to all its citizens. Instead, they are required to provide for themselves - and 50 million people can't afford the insurance. As a result, 18,000 US citizens die every year needlessly, because they can't access the care they require. That's equivalent to six 9/11s, every year, year on year. Yet the Republicans have accused the Democrats who are trying to stop all this death by extending healthcare of being "killers" - and they have successfully managed to put them on the defensive.

The Republicans want to defend the existing system, not least because they are given massive sums of money by the private medical firms who benefit from the deadly status quo. But they can't do so honestly: some 70 per cent of Americans say it is "immoral" to retain a medical system that doesn't cover all citizens. So they have to invent lies to make any life-saving extension of healthcare sound depraved.

A few months ago, a recent board member for several private health corporations called Betsy McCaughey reportedly noticed a clause in the proposed healthcare legislation that would pay for old people to see a doctor and write a living will. They could stipulate when (if at all) they would like care to be withdrawn. It's totally voluntary. Many people want it: I know I wouldn't want to be kept alive for a few extra months if I was only going to be in agony and unable to speak. But McCaughey started the rumour that this was a form of euthanasia, where old people would be forced to agree to death. This was then stretched to include the disabled, like Palin's youngest child, who she claimed would have to "justify" his existence. It was flatly untrue - but the right had their talking-point, Palin declared the non-existent proposals "downright evil", and they were off.

It's been amazingly successful. Now, every conversation about healthcare has to begin with a Democrat explaining at great length that, no, they are not in favour of killing the elderly - while Republicans get away with defending a status quo that kills 18,000 people a year. The hypocrisy was startling: when Sarah Palin was Governor of Alaska, she encouraged citizens there to take out living wills. Almost all the Republicans leading the charge against "death panels" have voted for living wills in the past. But the lie has done its work: a confetti of distractions has been thrown up, and support is leaking away from the plan that would save lives.

Red Herring -

Republicans mistakenly thought -- no, they only believed -- that Democrats were out to off the elderly and the weak. It was in all the papers.

Thank god that turned out to be false. ~ ed.     

These increasingly frenzied claims have become so detached from reality that they often seem like black comedy. The right-wing magazine US Investors' Daily claimed that if Stephen Hawking had been British, he would have been allowed to die at birth by its "socialist" healthcare system. Hawking responded with a polite cough that he is British, and "I wouldn't be here without the NHS".

This tendency to simply deny inconvenient facts and invent a fantasy world isn't new; it's only becoming more heightened. It ran through the Bush years like a dash of bourbon in water. When it became clear that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction, the US right simply claimed they had been shipped to Syria. When the scientific evidence for man-made global warming became unanswerable, they claimed - as one Republican congressman put it - that it was "the greatest hoax in human history", and that all the world's climatologists were "liars". The American media then presents itself as an umpire between "the rival sides", as if they both had evidence behind them.

It's a shame, because there are some areas in which a conservative philosophy - reminding us of the limits of grand human schemes, and advising caution - could be a useful corrective. But that's not what these so-called "conservatives" are providing: instead, they are pumping up a hysterical fantasy that serves as a thin skin covering some raw economic interests and base prejudices.

For many of the people at the top of the party, this is merely cynical manipulation. One of Bush's former advisers, David Kuo, has said the President and Karl Rove would mock evangelicals as "nuts" as soon as they left the Oval Office. But the ordinary Republican base believe this stuff. They are being tricked into opposing their own interests through false fears and invented demons. Last week, one of the Republicans sent to disrupt a healthcare town hall started a fight and was injured - and then complained he had no health insurance. I didn't laugh; I wanted to weep.

How do they train themselves to be so impervious to reality? It begins, I suspect, with religion. They are taught from a young age that it is good to have "faith" - which is, by definition, a belief without any evidence to back it up. You don't have "faith" that Australia exists, or that fire burns: you have evidence. You only need "faith" to believe the untrue or un-provable. Indeed, they are taught that faith is the highest aspiration and most noble cause. Is it any surprise this then percolates into their political views? Faith-based thinking spreads and contaminates the rational.

Up to now, Obama has not responded well to this onslaught of unreason. He has had a two-pronged strategy: conciliate the elite economic interests, and joke about the fanatical fringe they are stirring up. He has (shamefully) assured the pharmaceutical companies that an expanded healthcare system will not use the power of government as a purchaser to bargain down drug prices, while wryly saying in public that he "doesn't want to kill Grandma". Rather than challenging these hard interests and bizarre fantasies aggressively, he has tried to flatter and soothe them.

This kind of mania can't be co-opted: it can only be overruled. Sometimes in politics you will have enemies, and they must be democratically defeated. The political system cannot be gummed up by a need to reach out to the maddest people or the greediest constituencies. There is no way to expand healthcare without angering Big Pharma and the Republicaloons. So be it. As Arianna Huffington put it, "It is as though, at the height of the civil rights movement, you thought you had to bring together Martin Luther King and George Wallace and make them agree. It's not how change happens."

However strange it seems, the Republican Party really is spinning off into a bizarre cult who believe Barack Obama is a baby-killer plotting to build death panels for the grannies of America. Their new slogan could be - shrill, baby, shrill.

Source: TruthOut.org



The Rise and Fall
of the Nazi Empire

Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:08:44 -0600
To: ARNO <Arno>
 From: KRP nowscape@yahoo.com

I'm going to take some time off.  I'm taking a hiatus -- not an involuntary one like Glen Beck from FOX Noise.  When Beck has served his sentence and FAuX News's management lets him back on TV, that'd be your cue that I'm receptive to your email -- that is, if it were to contain answers to two questions -

Do you intend to copy the slides, as you promised our sister? What set you off to be so angry with me ?


Best regards, if deserved.

  "I promise !!!!!!!"
   Really, really this time, 
    for sure. Period.


No doubt;  No Lie!
   Trust me me.  No Joke... 


Pick one up for a friend!

Evolve Beyond Belief
Sunday, August 23, 2009 10:49 PM
From:  ARNO
To:  nowscape@yahoo.com
Cc: P.I.

Please don't send me any more of your political hate-mails. They are really tiresome. Your hatemongering is very boring. As far as YOUR slides are concerned, this is my LAST response concerning them, PERIOD.

It is a good thing that I did not make copies of them. They are washed out of color and don't even deserve copying as they are.What a waste of $ that would have been to make slides from slides. Mr. computer genious, you should have figured this out years ago. Why are you so fanatical about them anyway? You don't even apper on them at all, you were in Germany with Oma getting a "proper German education" You fool!!!

Arno says -

"I have decided [...]  to have them professionally put [...] on DVD..."

What a great decision, and how quickly and magnanimously you reached it!  I was afraid that I may have to brow beat you into this, eventually, but no, you volunteered to do the fight thing!

Here are some professional services
    fotobridge.com
    digmypics.com
     Search Google

He might decide to go along with the program after all.  Nah!  I could be wrong -- this may drag out a bit longer.

Oh, exclamation points. This is a for-sure-signal that he's in charge.

 L I N K :
    The Sure Sign

I have decided, WHEN I CHOSE TO DO SO!!!!  to didgitally revitalize them to their original color and have them professionally put them on DVD so I can watch them in their original splendor on my new digital projector. Then, the originals will be worthless garbage. I will not respond to any of your manias again.

Don't forget midnight, August 31st, 2009. After that date, you will be my new tennant in your ex-house in SLC, unless, of course your hate-blog against me on Google has been expunged.

You asked me "why do I hate you so much"? Look into a mirror, and you will easily find the answer.

'Till September 1st, 2009, when you will hear from my attorney. Bro

(N.B. This isn't being hidden from Arno, BTW -- this page is on the 'Net LIVE as we communicate.)

Sunday, August 23, 2009 10:50 PM
From:  ARNO
 To:  nowscape@yahoo.com

Nope, I'm glad you watch FOX news.  [I keep up with what the faith-based worry about.]

To: Arno
|From: nowscape@yahoo.com
Subject: 

You say "Don't forget August 31st, 2009, midnight. D-Day."
If I start working on this, calling Google, etc... then How do I know you'll really wait until then and not commence legal action before.

HA Ha ha hahaha...
Sunday, August 23, 2009 10:56 PM
From: Arno

I can't  b e l i e v e  this! 

To: nowscape@yahoo.com
Cc: P.I.

I gave you my word, should be good enough for you ‘nest pas mon ami? [sic]   ... but it sounds good in French :)

Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 03:30:36 -0600
To: Arno
From: nowscape@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: "the originals will be worthless garbage"

Arno, during a slow time at work this spring I scanned almost 1,900 slides plus reams, I mean reams of B+W & color negatives into my computer (see picture of gizmo below), including some of the ones from the same batch which you have. BTW, it's not true that I'm not in a single one of the Ethiopian slides -- I saw them, remember, when I was at your house and I know that about 6 of the 400+ shots were taken of me at / near the Haile Selassie Hospital, some on the balcony and some of my beloved Fips der Affe monkey -- my green vervet monkey pet...so why again, this, your knee-jerk default dishonesty about a little thing that?. Jesus fucking christ, be a man ! Plus, it was I who I took a lot of those pictures with dad's Edixa camera ! I still have that SLR camera. I viewed those slides with you & Sherry when you projected them at your house in your Jadwin duplex that October 2001 evening, after I had trustingly hand-carried them to your city for you, from here. (And the next morning when it was time for me to return home, you threw me $10 for a $25 cab fare [sic] to the airport, being too lazy or hung over -- I think hung over -- from drinking and slide-ing, to drive me to your city's airfield.

You see, I remember perfectly -- holding a grudge helps with this :)

Be that as it may, I did scan my slides and correct the colors using Photo Shop... how do you do it. It's tedious but it doesn't demand a brain surgeon to fix the colors of those original old slides. When you and I and your beautiful wife Sherry watched them at your house in 2001 the colors were still quite good!

How did you store them... take care of them since then, for them to have deteriorated so badly like you say now? Below I show you just one random sample slide from this same Ethiopia batch, so you can appreciate how well I took care of these heirloom slides -- the ones in my care... they are still vibrant and...OK, to say the least ! They were treated with respect and maintained in a hermetically appropriate copasetic temp / humidity environment, unlike the slovenly treatment which those that you commandeered received, according to your account. No respect; oh well, what's new.

RE: "I have decided, WHEN I CHOSE TO DO SO!!!! to didgitally revitalize them to their original color and have them professionally put them on DVD so I can watch them in their original splendor on my new digital projector." --- It's always stupid to expect to zuzel colors out from where there ain't none. Go ahead, buy a digital projector!! It's a mistake to get one of those :)

Nowadays' projectors won't not never do justice to the original colors, washed-out as they are. --- You ought to know from experience and I can attest to this from using my old digital projectors from 2008 and before -- I bet you already discovered that anyway but couldn't resist to display your salesman's puffing coming to the fore, eh? Besides... you can't get the *original* Kodachrome colors back, no matter what nuances you try, after the abuse you gave those slide trays, as you've as much as admitted. Not only that Kodachrome has always been too reddish to begin with, anyway -- and Ektachrome was natively too aquamarine. ( Our Ethiopian slides were almost all Kodachrome. )

The originals, "worthless as they are" like you state, will be valuable enough to me, as occasionally sought-after 1950s memorabilia --- "the originals will be worthless garbage", you believe, OK, and I still want them to be returned, like you promised to me before, and recently to our sister. They may be auctioned by me on eBay later maybe.

Thanks for offering to make the professionally mastered DVDs -- make that for yourself but not for me, please. Instead of a DVD, Please just make my copy a normal no frills CD containing uncompressed .gif files or .jpg / jpeg files, thanks! DVDs would be inappropriate for archiving as you should know. I hope you understand, and understand the difference.

RE: "the originals will be worthless garbage" --- I want that worthless garbage back, which you borrowed from me, OK? Thanks for understanding. Now we're FINALLY getting somewhere, eh!

As I told you, Google is a difficult thing to get things off of; I've never tried it before and you should help, too, adding your arguments to the thing, OK. You've done nothing towards that end yet... in fact you've openly said as much as that you wouldn't lift a finger. So I held off, too. Since you held off until now, how will I know that you won't sue me anyway, if I star this process by myself now. It's Aug 24 today.

RE: "What a waste of $ that would have been to make slides from slides." --- No, not really! It would have cost, max, about 200 dollars back then and we'd have copies now, and... we'd have had no fight! That's not a waste, brother. It is you whose idea it was to borrow the slides from me. It would have been a win, win, win, win+ situation, bozo !

I appreciate that you now at last are talking sense, and agree to a reasonable solution to our impasse by caving in and making the long-overdue copies for yourself. Good for you! All of them there bad feelings could have been avoided -- correct me if I'm wrong -- if you had done the right thing to begin with and had never thoughtlessly quipped "possession is nine tenths of the law", regarding ownership in this slide business. Correct me if I'm wrong.

I feel better now.

**** And please let me know what will happen if it goes over your time limit, your fucking DEADLINE, in "removing / expunging things from Google". Today is the 24th already. Don't tarry so fucking long to read your email, eh: that delay should no count against my time!

So far, in this whole trail-of-tears thing, you have made the white trash decisions as far as the guardianship of the slides goes and their return / copying, letting them decay, unlike the ones in *my* custody (see sample below - proof). Your Everything, the lies etc. etc., has been wrong, but now you seem to come around to the right way and I grudgingly give you credit for that, here :(

Bill Maher's rerun for this week is on as I write. It's billed as a liberal-biased Expose of Sarah Palin apologizing for a Faith-based Kenyan Witchdoctor misleading her about Down's syndrome. I'll keep you posted. Be nice.

And again, what is it that set you off against me in the first place? Please tell me.

-- Thanks in advance

    Attached:
My gizmo... It's easy but a bit tedious; try it if you don't want to pay to have the copying outsourced.
 This is a  one-time-only-use  gadget.   After all,  nobody wants  to scan their slides and negatives twice.

InternetS publisher's statement: Any inaccuracies will be corrected, if brought to publisher's attention. Emails received will be posted here in toto.
Do these things suck? Unpleasant experiences with people, companies, professionals and organizations. Scams.
♫
Is your global warming, Dear?
Kindly tell me, if so
Yes, my global's warming, Dear,
But in the morning, no

If Obama, president
Makes short shrift in the big tent
Say good-by, party of NO

♫
 Sung to the tune of  - ( lyricsplayground.com )
     BUT IN THE MORNING, NO !
But In The Morning, No!
 COLE PORTER by Julie Wilson

Hear a Free Sample:
When my old Gunga Din
Brings the Bromo-Seltzer in
That's the time when I'm in low.

  LINKS  Arno's audio Files  ♫  Far Cry - Lyrics 

Arno,

You should do something to demonstrate good will, too. I cleaned up the Internets' Backup Repository (WayBack Machine) and you should now contact Google like I told you; remember, I gave you until August 27 2009 to help with this.  And demonstrate a set of balls.  Please let me know what they say and whom to contact there.

And again, what is it that set you off against me in the first place? Please tell me.

FYI -- Here are some professional duplicating services:
  fotobridge.com
  digmypics.com
  Search Google
 
Publisher's statement:  Any inaccuracies will be corrected, if brought to publisher's attention.   Emails received will be posted, in toto.
Do these things suck? ~~ Unpleasant experiences with companies, professionals and organizations. Scams.

Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:45:49 -0400
From: ARNO
To: nowscape@nowscape.com>
Subject: Your answer AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!
 Cc: ***@gmail.com
Sensitivity: Normal
And I told you before, look into your bathroom mirror, and you will see the answer. I told you again and again I want not more (political) hate mail from you. The ONLY exchange of correspondence between us I wish is between your and my attorneys, PERIOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
5 more days left for you to expunge your hateblog on Google against me.You will finally get what you deserve. If you don't pay the jugement against you I will attach your house, and then decide whether or not to allow you to remain there as a tennant.
You made your bed, now sleep in it.
To: nowscape@yahoo.com
CC: p***@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:31:59 -0700
From: Arno
Subject: RE: "the originals will be worthless garbage"  --  Thread-Index: AcoknsKtUxSyj/UCSH6rfslqoxqOIwCJVoMQ
I really don?t care about the 6 slides. What is a  Jadwin duplex? Never  heard of it. Go back to the liquor store down the hill to refresh your memory.
They really are worthless garbage to me, haven?t seen them since 2001. Probably never will again soon. I don?t want to be reminded of the dysfunctional heritage I stem from, ESPECIALLY YOU, just look at your (political, psychotic) rantings and ravings below. Look into a mirror and see for yourself, Mr. digital computer genius.  Why should I care about YOUR nostalgic cravings anyway? PLEASE, JUST LEAVE ME ALONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. D-Day is only  five days away.

Bcc [sic] to Peter More, Attorney at Law.
From: Arno
To: nowscape@yahoo.com
CC: P***@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:09:33 -0700
 Subject: RE: Re: Fwd: Review of my NewSpace Speech -- Thread-Index: AcolToxR7Ko5RYkeQqiEDzjl/Oij+ABhRjAg
Why should I help you out of the pile of shit you have heaped upon yourself (and me & my family)? Even If I WANTED to help, remember I am the too stupid to understand computer stuff, as you have repeatedly told me. You are the computer genius as you have bragged to everyone (me) for decades. Should be a cinch for you fix it and ?do the right thing?. You made the poison soup, so eat it yourself.

Dear Mr. Moore,
This is written to Arno, my estranged brother; he asked me to email you and not him from now on.  Please tell him this, what I'm saying here; this is what I want to tell him;  thanks in advance.

Arno, if you will ask I will tell you why I'm angry with you, and I'll not give some goofy platitude as a reason, such as when you tell me "look in the mirror".

So, really, please say what it is that set you off, anyway? Is it the current political situation?  It seems to have set off some Republicans as of late to do and act irrationally. Many are literally up in arms, as you know.  And your favorite presidential contender, Romney1 lost miserably in the last election.  I can't think of what I did to set you off against me.

Milieu Compass --
A guide for Internet readers of the future...  this was written in 2009. 

There was much political unrest in the US, mostly emanating from the right wing of the Republican party, the pustule of the buckle of the Wholly Babble belt.  May white republicans couldn't accept that the country had elected a half black, half white president, after the two terms of their their barely re-elected country bumpkin had expired.  They had hoped Mitt Romney, a conservative Mormon who actually believes himself to be a space alien from the planet KOLOB, would be elected to lead the country.

G.W. BUSH Memorial Sewage Works
 Presidential Memorial Commission
  of San Francisco

Bush's Accomplishments

"Ah read the Wholly Babble every day"

"Peninshula" Bush Pronunciation Guide

But no, it was to be the articulate, erudite mixed race Barak Obama, instead, who won the presidency.  Obama sounds foreign, unlike the name Bush, who pronounces the word country as cunt-she.  Yes, foreign, especially if Obama's foes, the boondocks-bumpkins  consider that Obama's middle name happens to be Hussein fue to his father's islamic background.  That was the last straw for the Faith-based, proud-to-be-American true believers. 
Big Fat Idiot radio comedians stoked the flames, telling these functionally illiterate AM radio True Christian Believers that Obama was secretly a foreigner, a Moslem and thus could not legally be president.  That sounded palpable to these uneducated fearful gun-totion cap wearers, especially since Obama had once identified these same faith-based near-illiterates, in a campaign speech, as those who fear he would take away their guns and religion.

It all seemed to fit.  Next these (mostly) faith-based Republicans let themselves get stoked up (by corporate interests) to carry knives, pistols, automatic weapons and bazookas *  to events where Obama spoke in 2009.  No kidding.

Maybe it's the political climate in which Arno's long-time heroes were shredded which finally  -tilted his ire against me; perhaps it's that which set him off so against me.  Previous email correspondence with him leads me to consider this as a hypothesis, but in truth I really don't know what set Arno off. Some of this background material is included here so that you, the Internet reader of latter part of the century will recognize, in part, the milieu -- the matrix in which this email correspondence reproduced here, is set.

*  I made that part up, about the bazookas

Dreams from My Father:
A Story of Race and Inheritance
 By Barack Obama    Paperback

Obama argues with himself on almost every page of this lively autobiographical conversation.

He gets you to agree with him, and then he brings in a counter-narrative that seems just as convincing!

Son of a white American mother and of a black Kenyan father whom he never knew, Obama grew up mainly in Hawaii...
♫   Play your didgeridoo, Blue
Play your didgeridoo
Ah, like, keep playin' 'til I shoot thru, Blue
Play your didgeridoo
Altogether now!

Now you show just how mean spirited you are! You say you don't care about the slides except to didger-redoo "them to their original color and have them professionally put them on DVD so I can watch them in their original splendor"  You "haven't looked at them since 2001"!    In  the same breath you, snake, say that they are "worthless garbage" to you and that you will have this garbage reproduced and put on  a "DVD", as you say.  Ok, I believe you, but to be polite and not use the L-word , I'd say this is a mixed signal.

Really, please say what it is that set you off against me to begin with.  The Internets web pages are to help Identify who threatened me in case anything happens.  OK?

When you broadcast  as in your email, "Bcc to Peter More, Attorney at Law",  you are stupidly defeating the purpose of the blind part of Bcc: "Blind carbon copy" ?  , aren't you?  After all, the "B" in Bcc is to keep the recipient unaware that you've sent a copy to someone else, yes?  What part of Bcc don't you understand?  Which of us, really, is drunk tonight?

When you say "...reminded [me] of the dysfunctional heritage I stem from, ESPECIALLY YOU..." you say something really strange.  You don't stem from my heritage, for christ's sake.  You are your own man.  At worst you are the  Hampelmann.   I am not your ancestor -- I am, sadly and unfortunately -- your sibling.  And your victim.  Get a brain.

It would be quite easy to put this feud behind us if you were to do just a couple of easy to do no-cost things!  But you choose to hold on to these "really worthless garbage" slides which you never look at, anyway.  How queer!
Spoiling for a fight, eh?  Be nice!

Real 'Cc' to Peter More, Attorney Law -- as per your instructions

1 - Arno wrote last year: "Did you know that Mitt Romney(R)is a MOMORON... he is Faith Based?" "... [this] Must really rankle you. What goes around, comes around [sic]. And it is quite possible, that the next President of the United States (2009) will be a Mormon too, again, ever heard of Mitt Romney, former Governor of the most liberal State, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the home or Ted Kennedy? Chaps your hyde, no doubt."


  Perhaps embarrassed that he repeatedly misspelled tenant as tennant, Arno, the long time experienced real estate oriented landlord,
  fired off duplicate emails to me... 

 Actual un-retouched screen shot"

  It looks like junk spam, quite discombobulated; for fun it's shown here...

 ...snip...

  Receiving this spam didn't irritate me.
  It shows that Arno actually went to dictionary.com twice in order to find out how to spell tenant.

  Related searches:  How can a Landlord ...

Ernie, the nuclear plant supervisor was about to go on his first vacation in almost 20 years.  He left the foreman in charge of the control room ...
   
Ernie lectured again to the control room crew to be sure to watch all the gauges. He reiterated how to cool the core by adding water if a nuclear meltdown should threaten.  And he reminded them about the dangers of over-filling the core with water, to avoid explosive pressure buildup from the steam, etc.
    
Having explained all that, as he was leaving, he turned and reminded the crew,  "Just remember, you can't add too much water to a nuclear reactor."   

~ Source Nowscape.com...   From a classic Saturday Night Live episode hosted by Ed Asner.

  AUG 1  2009    Arno, again, decided to block his email:

Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:20:25 -0600
To: "Arno " Arno
From:  <nowscape@nowscape.com>
Subject: PING...

X-Apparently-To: nowscape@nowscape.com via 209.191.90.77; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:21:39 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [68.142.200.237]
Authentication-Results: mta108.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com from=yahoo.com; domainkeys=pass (ok); from=yahoo.com; dkim=neutral (no sig)

 Date: 2 Sep 2009 21:21:29 -0000
 From: MAILER-DAEMON@yahoo.com
To: nowscape@nowscape.com
Subject: failure notice
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<AIllig@skrealtors.com>:
64.185.112.82 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Message rejected as spam by Content Filtering.

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: <nowscape@nowscape.com>
Received: (qmail 94550 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2009 21:21:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO VALUED-3253602F.nowscape.com) (admin@71.195.206.171 with login)
by smtp102.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Sep 2009 21:21:23 -0000

X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:20:47 -0600
To: "Arno " Arno
From:  <nowscape@nowscape.com>
Subject: PING...
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
 From: ARNO ILLIG <arnoillig@charter.net>
To: KRP <nowsc@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Harald is unblocked
Cc: Petra.illig@Gmail.com
 
Hey Mr. compurer genius:
If I had you blocked, how come I can read another one of your lies?????
My attorney will correspond with your attorney only. But since you are the smartest person on this planet other than Hillary, I'm sure you can be a lawer in your own defense too. "Go ahead, make my day".  I will enjoy watching you in a court of law acting as your own attorney. Oh, to be a fly on the wall that day!!!!
I suggest you sober up for a few days prior to your spectacular court appearance.
Can't wait, A
--
ARNO ILLIG, REALTOR(R)
SK REAL ESTATE INC.
79 AARON DRIVE # 200
RICHLAND WA 99352

 
Aillig@SKRealtors.com
SKRealtors.com/Arnoillig

 
Off  (888)323-7868 x 4303
     (509)946-6611
Fax  (509)946-0113
Cell (509)948-1122
 "My attorney will correspond with your attorney only."

What, only four exclamation points and only 5 question marks today ????????????????????????!!!!!!!!????...

To answer your question... you can see my email sent to you at charter.net but not at "Thief" <AIllig@skrealtors.com>. OK, numb nuts? 
Can't you remember which you blocked this time?  Or can't you figure out how to block charter.net also?
Thank you for your inquiry!

What lie are you talking about...
I will fix anything on the web that's not true... you know that.  I am honest with you on this.


RE: "My attorney will correspond with your attorney only."
That's a good idea, attorney to attorney!  Why didn't I think of it?

However I email your attorney about everything, even this, just as you instructed me to do.
You don 't receive all my correspondence because you block your email and because you told me only to email Mr. Moore instead of you.


Q:  Do you want my attorney's name, email, contact information -- A: yes or no?

RE: "[I] can't wait, A"  Well,  Mr. A' -- You  *CAN*  wait -- Bet me.  Wait. 
 

Wait, wait, don't tell me!  You sure are a DUMB FUCK, a liar, a cheat and no doubt a THIEF, too, Mr. Richland realtor man, Mr. TeNNant boy, HA, Ha, ha, hahaha...
And thanks for the compliment about my being smart... you don't have to tell me over and over again. Keep it under your hat. Thanks!

Bye

Ps: Why don't you want to settle out of court?  Do you want me to start negotiating with GOOGLE, yes or no?
cc: pmoore@cowanmoore.com

 

Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:30:39 -0600
To: "Arno Illig" AIllig@skrealtors.com, arnoillig@charter.net
From: nowscape@nowscape.com
Subject: "Make me an offer I can't refuse."

Do you want to settle out of court? OK, so what do you think it would take for us to settle out of court?

Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:46:51 -0600
To: "Arno Illig" <AIllig@skrealtors.com>
From: nowscape@nowscape.com
Subject: well

 well?

Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:37:29 -0600
To: arnoillig@charter.net
From: nowscape@nowscape.com

So, what do you say to my proposal from last week?

Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:56:21 -0700
 From: ARNO ILLIG <arnoillig@charter.net>
To: nowscape@nowscape.com
Subject: Re[sic]: To what?
Please, next time you send me an e-mail have a subject filled in so I know whether or not to bother opening it. Yes or no to what?
My attorney is still on vacation hiking the Continental Divide from the Canadian border south. Don't know when he'll be back. Should be close to SLC by now. Maybe you could head him off at the pass and ask him yourself?
No subject line, no more responses.

 LINK:  "Hiking the Appalachian trail"

Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:57:11 -0600
To: ARNO ILLIG <arnoillig@charter.net>
From: nowscape@nowscape.com
Subject: Re: To what?

I asked you several times 2 weeks ago if you want to settle out of court. Try to be civil in your response next time and quick.
Sincerely

Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:59:48 -0700
From: ARNO ILLIG <arnoillig@charter.net>
To: nowscape@nowscape.com
 Subject: Re: To what?

NO, quick and civil enough?

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2009 02:01:01 -0600
To: "Arno Illig" <AIllig@skrealtors.com>
From: nowscape@nowscape.com
Subject: well

 well?

Date: 9/18/2009
To: ARNO ILLIG <arnoillig@charter.net>
From: nowscape@nowscape.com
Subject:


As you've seen no doubt your Google entry has been removed from Google. Now you need to do your thing as It won't be removed from Google forever. YOU NEED TO CALL THEM or it will be put it back automatically by the Google net-spider. Only you can prevent this -- I told you before I can't do everything. Don't believe me? Google yourself, "Arno Illig"!

Let me know if you changed your mind about wanting to settle, this is my last on this.

Date: 9/26/2009
To: arnoillig@charter.net
From: nowscape@nowscape.com
Subject:

It's been removed from GOOGLE!  But now I see it's still on YAHOO. Do you want that removed also...


 "Please, next time you send me an e-mail have a subject filled in so I know whether or not to bother opening it!"

HA Ha haha Ha!

Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:22
 From: ARNO ILLIG <arnoillig@charter.net>
To: nowscape@nowscape.com
Subject: Re:
Cc: *** <***@gmail.com>

Yes, please.
--
ARNO ILLIG, REALTOR(R)
SK REAL ESTATE INC.
79 AARON DRIVE # 200
RICHLAND WA 99352

Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:28
To: arnoillig@charter.net
From: nowscape@nowscape.com
Subject: Fwd: Re:

Please, next time you send me an e-mail have a subject filled in so I know whether or not to bother opening it

Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:11
To: ARNO ILLIG <arnoillig@charter.net>
From: nowscape@nowscape.com
Subject: "Hiking the Appalachian Trail"

Hiking the Apalachian Trail

Is your attorney still "Hiking the Appalachian Trail"?

Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 18:21:31 -0700
From: ARNO ILLIG <arnoillig@charter.net>
To: nowscape@nowscape.com
Subject: Re: Peace Bro

Harald,
I'm really not interested in engaging in another fight with you. Please leave me alone, go away, and stop harrassing me.

--
ARNO ILLIG, REALTOR(R)
SK REAL ESTATE INC.
79 AARON DRIVE # 200
RICHLAND WA 99352


Aillig@SKRealtors.com
SKRealtors.com/Arnoillig


Off (888)323-7868 x 4303
(509)946-6611
Fax (509)946-0113
Cell (509)948-1122

Great... so the lawsuit is off! THANK YOU! Is Peter still "hiking the Appalachian Trail"?

All is well that ends :)

What was your interest in threatening a fight in the first place, then?
Kindest regards.

Bcc [sic]: 'PM00RE@C0WANM00RE.C0M'
 

 

Original emails on file are available upon request; email.  Privacy policy.
"ALL INFORMATION HEREIN IS PROVIDED  IS DEEMED GENERALLY RELIABLE, BUT IS NOT GUARANTEED AND SHOULD BE INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED.